1. What’s the idea/concept that is original?
That good individual experiences form humans in greater means than negative people вЂ“ key phrases are good peoples experience, form humans and greater means.
2. Just how can it is argued by me differently?
We’re able to get directly against it and say good individual experiences do perhaps perhaps not contour individuals in greater methods than negative people.
Or, we’re able to twist it and state that some good peoples experiences shape people in greater ways than negative people.
Or, we might even argue that negative peoples experiences shape human experiences more valuable than good people!
With regard to this instance we will go utilizing the latter.
3. How to change it into a complex thesis?
This might be simply about just shuffling terms around until we get the right combination.
вЂњNegative experiences shape someone in greater methods than good onesвЂќ is okay, but we’re able to include ideas that are complex.
We are able to do that by changing it to вЂњnegative view experiences shape people in greater methods than good people by perhaps maybe maybe perhaps not reinforcing duplicated actions but alternatively a possiblity to allow modification.вЂќ